Integration and Deployment of E911 Phase II

We are providing program management, technical definition / development, and integration services to nationwide carriers in the rollout of both network-based and handset based positioning technologies for E911 Phase II.

" The client required assistance with the integration of new nodes into their wireless network. " New features were required to further streamline the operational aspects of supporting E911. " Accuracy testing was required to demonstrate that the positioning technology could support FCC-stated requirements. " The client required assistance in the rollout of E911 across its markets.		" Data requirements and sources were identified in an architectural white paper and then implemented in software. " Our technical team is now working directly with the vendor on new feature / service enhancements. " Our team provided third party accuracy testing including preparation, execution in the markets, and analysis / troubleshooting of results. " Our program management team efficiently worked with markets in the rollout of E911.		" A scalable, fully operational solution now provides the link between network data across the network and the new E911nodes. " New upgrades to the technology have increased positioning accuracy and reduced headcount for supporting E911. " The client now has accuracy results, certified by a 3rd party, for several markets to provide to the FCC. " The clients E911 solution is compliant with FCC-imposed deadlines and has not been fined.

E911 Solution for a Leading Wireless Carrier

We ranked the different solutions and developed vendor selection criteria. Our analysis identified the best techno-economic solution.

" Our client needed to implement an E911 solution in accordance with the FCC mandate.The client wanted a solution that would not only fulfill the mandate but also allow it to provide location based services monetize investments. " The technology to be employed needed to be identified. " All the vendor solutions applicable to the technology needed to be evaluated and ranked. " Time to market, scalability and compatibility needed evaluation.		" Our approach to the problem was from a technology, project management and strategic perspective. " We evaluated the components that would be impacted. " We surveyed all the possible solutions and evaluated them based on our clients needs. " We developed a ranking matrix that ranked the selected solutions. The ranking parameters were developed in consultation with our client.		" inCode recommended a vendor based on price, reliability, quality, and features. " The client was able to identify the lowest cost solution. " The selected solution fitted with the carriers current technology and migration plans. " The selected vendor had the shortest time to market. This would help the client meet the FCC mandate. " The client developed an effective LBS strategy.